Quantcast
Channel: Mellanox Interconnect Community: Message List
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6226

Re: Unstable operation of WinOFED 4.40.0 with HCA fw 2.30.3200 on Win2012 Server

$
0
0

So far recently I've installed new WinOF and firmware. So things are going better now, but still I have some issues with packet loss. As before, linux to linux communications are good and linux to windows are not. I've ran few flood ping tests to understand how does latency and loss rate depend on WinOF and fw versions. Here is test summary:

 

 

Win 2012, WinOF 4.40, fw 2.30.3200

2156359 packets transmitted, 2127781 received, 1% packet loss, time 471502ms

rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.032/0.043/3.439/0.019 ms, ipg/ewma 0.218/0.043 ms

 

Win 2012, WinOF 4.40, fw 2.30.8000

197278 packets transmitted, 193214 received, 2% packet loss, time 57419ms

rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.020/0.022/3.742/0.026 ms, ipg/ewma 0.291/0.022 ms

 

Win 2012, WinOF 4.60, wf 2.30.8000

45086 packets transmitted, 44350 received, 1% packet loss, time 10878ms

rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.021/0.025/2.431/0.024 ms, ipg/ewma 0.241/0.023 ms

 

This case I had low packet loss rate and average latency.

Win 2012 R2, WinOF 4.60, fw 2.30.8000

699589 packets transmitted, 698741 received, 0% packet loss, time 57022ms

rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.041/0.051/12.418/0.073 ms, ipg/ewma 0.081/0.048 ms

 

The only case I had no packet loss, but high latency.

Win 2012 R2, WinOF 4.45, fw 2.30.8000

347256 packets transmitted, 347256 received, 0% packet loss, time 39444ms

rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.081/0.098/13.205/0.087 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 0.113/0.097 ms

 

In short: WinOF 4.45 provides best reliability, while WinOF 4.40 provides best latency.

Still looking forward to find solution to combine it into one.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6226

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>